PACE · 7 min read
Disclosure Before Interview Advice
Reps need sufficient disclosure to advise on interview under Code C. The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 framework expects clients to understand the nature of the allegation before the caution is relied on in interview.
Minimum disclosure for advice
Before advising on no comment, prepared statement, or answer, reps need enough detail about the allegation and evidence. Code C and professional standards require meaningful consultation — advising blind is unsafe.
Requesting further disclosure
Reps press the OIC or custody for additional material within reason — witness summaries, CCTV existence, forensic timelines. Document requests and responses for the firm file.
CIT and MCQ patterns
- Interview scheduled before adequate disclosure
- Client asked to decide strategy without knowing allegation
- Conflict between client account and initial disclosure
- Pressure to proceed before rep has reviewed custody record
Frequently asked questions
How much disclosure must police provide?
Enough for legal advice at the police station — exact content varies by case type and stage. Reps challenge insufficiency before interview under Code C principles.
Is disclosure the same as full case papers?
No — initial disclosure is limited. Full disclosure comes later in the investigation or proceedings; reps manage client expectations accordingly.
Does PSR Train cover disclosure scenarios?
Yes — MCQs and CIT modules include insufficient disclosure and timing issues tied to Code C.
Related guides
Prepare with PSR Train
PSR Train offers timed MCQs, module-based study, Code C–aligned content, and CIT-style scenarios to support your PSRAS preparation. Training guidance only — completion does not confer accreditation.
This guide is general training information for PSRAS candidates in England and Wales. It is not legal advice and does not replace firm supervision, official assessment materials, or authorised assessment organisations.